References listed in Table 1 and S1




Yüklə 21.4 Kb.
tarix23.04.2016
ölçüsü21.4 Kb.
S2. References listed in Table 1 and S1

  1. Del Castillo RF: Factors influencing the genetic structure of Phacelia dubia, a species with a seed bank and large fluctuations in population size. Heredity 72:446-458 (1994).

  2. Gillett GW: Evolutionary relationships of Phacelia linearis. Brittonia 14:231-236 (1962).

  3. Gilbert C, Dempcy J, Ganong C, Patterson R, Spicer GS: Phylogenetic relationships within Phacelia subgenus Phacelia (Hydrophyllaceae) inferred from nuclear rRNA ITS sequence data. Am Soc Plant Tax 30:627-634 (2005).

  4. Eckhart VM: Spatio-temporal variation in abundance and variation in foraging behavior of the pollinators of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Oikos 64:573-586 (1992).

  5. Heckard LR: The Hydrophyllaceae. Quarterly Rev Biology 38:117-123 (1963).

  6. Murdy WH: The systematics of Phacelia masculata and P. dubia var. georgiana, both endemic to granite outcrop communities. Am J Bot 53:1028-1036 (1966).

  7. Baskin JM, Baskin CC: Some aspects of the autecology and population biology of Phacelia purshii. Amer Midl Nat 96:431-442 (1976).

  8. Jepson WL: A Flora of California, Vol 3. Associated Students Store, Berkley (1943).

  9. Constance L: A revision of Phacelia subgenus Cosmanthus (Hydrophyllaceae). Contr. Gray Herb 168:1-48(1949).

  10. Routley MB, Bertin RI, Husband BC: Correlated evolution of dichogamy and self-incompatibility: A phylogenetic perspective. International Journal of Plant Science 165:983-9993 (2004).

  11. Murawski DA, Fleming TH, Ritland K, Hamrick JL: Mating system of Pachycereus pringlei: an autotetraploid cactus. Heredity 72:86-94 (1994).

  12. Parfitt BD: Dioecy in North American Cactaceae: A review. SIDA 11:200-206 (1984).

  13. Remski MF: Cytological investigations in Mammillaria and some associated genera. Botanical Gazette 116:163-171 (1954).

  14. Craig RT: The Mammillaria handbook. Abbey Garden Press, Pasadena (1954).

  15. Christian DA, Palomino G, Garçía A, Mémdez I: Nuclear genome size and karyotype analysis in Mammillaria species (Cactaceae). Caryologia 59: 177-186 (2006).

  16. Baker MA: Circumscription of Echinocereus arizonicus subsp. arizonicus: phenetic analysis of morphological characters in section Triglochidiatus (Cactaceae), part II. Madroño 53:388-399 (2006).

  17. Baker MA: New florally dimorphic hexaploid, Echinocereus yavapaiensis sp. nov. (section Triglochidiatus, Cactaceae) from central Arizona. Plant Syst Evol 258:63-83 (2006).

  18. Cota JH, Philbrick CT: Chromosome number variation and polyploidy in the genus Echinocereus (Cactaceae). Am J Bot 81:1054-1062 (1994).

  19. Desfeux C, Maurice S, Henry J, Lejeune B, Gouyon B: Evolution of reproductive systems in genus Silene. Proc Roy Soc B 263:409-414 (1996).

  20. Popp M, Oxelman B: Origin and evolution of Northern American polyploid Silene (Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 94:330-349 (2007).

  21. Kruckeberg AR: Interspecific hybridizations of Silene. Am J Bot 42:373-378 (1955).

  22. Prentice HC: Numerical analysis of infraspecific variation in Eurpoean Silene alba and S. dioica (Caryophyllaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 78:181-212 (1979).

  23. Kephart SR, Brown E, Hall J: Inbreeding depression and partial selfing: Evolutionary implications of mixed-mating in a coastal endemic, Silene douglasii var. oraria (Caryophyllaceae). Heredity 82:543-554 (1999).

  24. Volz SM, Renner SS: Hybridization, polyploidy, and evolutionary transitions between monoecy and dioecy in Bryonia (Cucurbitaceae). Am J Bot, 95:1297-1306 (2008).

  25. Anderberg AA: Phylogeny of the Empetraceae, with special emphasis on character evolution in the genus Empetrum. Syst Bot 19:35-46 (1994).

  26. Popp M, Mirre V, and Brochmann, C: A single Mid-Pleistocene long-distance dispersal by a bird can explain the extreme bipolar disjunction in crowberries (Empetrum) PNAS 108:6520-6525 (2011).

  27. Obbard DJ, Harris SA, Buggs RJA, Pannell JR: Hybridization, polyploidy, and the evolution of sexual systems in Mercurialis (Euphorbiaceae) Evolution, 60:1801-1815 (2006).

  28. Krahenbuhl M, Yuan YM, Kupfer, P: Chromosome and breeding system evolution of the genus Mercurialis (Euphorbiaceae): Implications of ITS molecular phylogeny. Plant Systematic and Evolution 234:155-170 (2002).

  29. Abberton MT: Interspecific hybridization in the genus Trifolium. Plant Breed 126:337-342 (2007).

  30. Molina-Freaner F, Jain SK: Inbreeding effects in a gynodioecious population of the colonizing species Trifolium hirtum. Evolution 47:1472-1479 (1993).

  31. Williams WM, Wllison NW, Ansari HA, Verry IM, Hussain SW: Experimental evidence for the ancestry of allotetraploid Trifolium repens and creation of synthetic forms with value for plant breeding. BMC Plant Biol 12 (2012).

  32. Bussell JD, Waycott M, Chappill JA, and James SH: Molecular Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of complex hybridity in Isotoma petraea. Evolution 56:1296-1302 (2002).

  33. McComb JA: The occurrence of unisexuality and polyploidy in Isotoma fluviatilis. Aus J Bot, 16: 525-537 (1968).

  34. Carr GD: Chromosome evolution and speciation in Hawaiian flowering plants. Evolution and speciation of island plants. Ono M, ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).

  35. Motley TJ, Carr GD: Artificial hybridization in the Hawaiian endemic genus Labordia (Longaniaceae). Am J Bot 85:654-660 (1998).

  36. Maki M: Fixation indices and genetic diversity in hermaphroditic and gynodioecious populations of Japanese Chionographis (Liliaceae). Heredity 68:329-336 (1992).

  37. Raven PH: A survey of reproductive biology in Onagraceae. New Zeal J Bot 17:575-593 (1979).

  38. Atsatt PR, Rundel PW: Pollinator maintenance vs. fruit production: Partitioned reproductive effort in subdioecious Fuchsia lycioides. Ann Miss Bot Gard 69:199-208 (1982).

  39. Nowicke JW, Skvarla JJ, Raven PH, Berry PE: A palynological study of the genus Fuchsia (Onagraceae). Ann Miss Bot Gard 71:35-91 (1984).

  40. Hoshino T, Berry PE: Observations on polyploidy in Fuchsia sets. Quelusia and Kierschlegeria (Onagraceae). Ann Miss Bot Gard 76:585-592 (1989).

  41. Berry PE: A systematic revision of Fuchsia sect. Quelusia (Onagaraceae). Ann Miss Bot Gard 76:532-584 (1989).

  42. Godley EJ: Breeding systems in New Zealand plants, I. Fuchsia. Ann Bot 76:549-559 (1955).

  43. Godley EJ: Breeding systems in New Zealand Plants 2. Genetics of the sex forms in Fuchsia procumbens. New Zeal J Bot 1:48-52 (1963).

  44. Talluri RS, Murray BG: DNA C-values and chromosome numbers in Fuchsia L. (Onagraceae) species and artificial hybrids. New Zeal J Bot 47:33-37 (2009).

  45. Kinney MS, Columbus T, Friar EA: Dicliny in Bouteloua (Poaceae: Chloridoideae): implications for the evolution of dioecy. Aliso 23:605-614 (2007).

  46. Smith BW: The mechanism of sex determination in Rumex hastaulus. Genetics 48:1265-1288 (1963).

  47. Singh RB, Smith BW: The mechanism of sex determination in Rumex acetosella. Theor Appl Gen 41:360-364 (1971).

  48. Navajas-Perez R, de la Herran R, Gonzalez GL, Jamilena M, Lozano R, et al: The evolution of reproductive systems and sex-determining mechanisms within Rumex (Polygonaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplastidial sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 22:1929-1939 (2005).

  49. Stehlik I, Kron P, Barrett SCH, Husband BC: Sexing pollen reveals female bias in a dioecious plant. New Phyt 175:185-194 (2007).

  50. Löve A, Sarkar N: Cytotaxonomy and sex determination of Rumex paucifolius. Can J Bot 34:261-268 (1956).

  51. Suda J, Kyncl T, Freiova R: Nuclear DNA amounts in Macronesian angiosperms. Ann Bot 92:153-164 (2003).

  52. Dudgeon W: Morphology of Rumex crispus. Bot Gaz 66:393-420 (1918).

  53. Löve A: Rumex lunaria L., a gynodioecious tetraploid species. Nature 151:559-560 (1943).

  54. Ichikawa S, Sparrow, AH, Frankton C, Nauman AF, Smith EB, Pond V: Chromosome number, volume and nuclear volume relationships in a polyploid series (2x-20x) of the genus Rumex. Can J Gen Cyt 13:842-863 (1971).

  55. Kaplan SM, Mulcahy DL: Mode of pollination and floral sexuality in Thalictrum. Evolution 25:659-668 (1971).

  56. Hancock JF, Bringhurst RS: Sexual dimorphism in the strawberry Fragaria chiloensis. Evolution 34:762-768 (1980).

  57. Hancock JF, Bringhurst RS: Ecological differentiation in perennial, octoploid species of Fragaria. American Journal of Botany 66:367-375 (1979).

  58. Staudt G: The species of Fragaria, their taxonomy and geographical distribution. Acta Horticulturae 265:23-33 (1989).

  59. Staudt G: Strawberry biogeography, genetics and systematics. Acta Horticulturae 842:71-84 (2009).

  60. Töpel M, Lundberg M, Eriksson T, Eriksen B: Molecular data and ploidal levels indicate several putative allopolyploidization events in the genus Potentilla (Rosaceae). PLoS Current 3 (2011).

  61. Guillén A, Rico E, Castroviejo S: Reproductive biology of the Iberian species of Potentilla L. (Rosaceae). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 62:9-21 (2005).

  62. Eriksson O: Regulation of seed-set and gender variation in the hermaphroditic plant Potentilla anserina. Oikos 49:165-171 (1987).

  63. Cobon AM, Matfield B: Morphological and cytological studies on a hexaploid clone of Potentilla anserina L. Watsonia 11:125-129 (1976).

  64. Holm S, Ghatnekar L, Bengtsson BO: Selfing and outcrossing but no apomixis in two natural populations of diploid Potentilla argentea. J Evol Biol 10:343-352 (1997).

  65. Holm S, Ghatnekar L: Apomixis and sexuality in hexaploid Potentilla argentea. Hereditas 125:53-60 (1996).

  66. Lundberg M, Töpel M, Eriksen B, Nylander JAA, Eriksson T: Allopolyploidy in Fragariinae (Rosaceae): Comparing four DNA sequence regions, with comments on classification. Mol Phyl Evol 51:269-280 (2009).

  67. Nicolé F, Tellier F, Agnés V, Till-Bottraud I: Conservation unit status inferred for plants by combining interspecific crosses and AFLP. Cons Gen 8:1273-1285 (2007).

  68. Klackenberg J: The holoacrtic complex of Potentilla fruticosa (Rosaceae). Nor J Bot 3:181-191 (2008).

  69. Eriksen B: Mating systems in two species of Potentilla from Alaska. Folia Geobotanica 31:333-344 (1996).

  70. Nylén J, Hamre E, Nordal I: Facultative apomixes and hybridization in arctic Potentilla section Niveae (Rosaceae_ from Svalbard. Bot J Linn Soc 142:373-381 (2003).

  71. Davidson, C: Potentialla fruticosa taxonomy and international registration. Acta Horticulturae 413:157-162 (1995).

  72. Eriksson, T, Donoghue MJ, Hibbs MS: Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Plant Syst Evol 211:155-179 (1998).

  73. Amsellem L, Noyer J, Hossaert-McKey M: Evidence for a switch in the reproductive biology of Rubus alceifolius (Roasceae) towards apomixis, between its native range and its area of introduction. Am J Bot 88:2243-2251 (2001).

  74. Kollman J, Steinger T, Roy BA: Evidence of sexuality in European Rubus (Rosaceae) species based on AFLP and allozyme analysis. Am J Bot 87:1592-1598 (2000).

  75. McDougall GJ, Martinussen I, Junttila O, Verrall S, Stewart D: Assessing the influence of genotype and temperature on polyphenol composition in Cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus L.) Using a Novel Mass Spectrometric Method. J Agr Food Chem 59:10860-10868 (2011).

  76. Rozanova MA: Variation in the processes of form development in some species of the genus Rubus. Akademii nauk SSSR :210-216 (1960).

  77. Cane JH: Pollination potential of the bee Osmia aglaia for cultivated red raspberries and blackberries (Rubus: Rosaceae). Hort Sci 40:1705-1708 (2005).

  78. Sutherland B: Phylogenetics of Rubus ursinus and R. macraei (Rosaceae): Evidence of hybrid origin. Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green (2005).

  79. Thomson JD, Brunet J: Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. T Ecol Evol 5:11-16 (1990).

  80. Alice LA, Campbell CS: Phylogeny of Rubus (Rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed space region sequences. Am J Bot 86:81-97 (1999).

  81. Olson MS: Bayesian procedures for discriminating among hypotheses with discrete distributions: Inheritance in the tetraploid Astilbe biternata. Genetics 147:1955-1942 (1997).

  82. Olson MS, Antonovics J: Correlation between male and female reproduction in the subdioecious herb Astilbe biternata (Saxifragaceae). Am J Bot 87:837-844 (2000).

  83. Trader BW: Molecular and morphological investigation of Astilbe. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. (2006).

  84. Miller JS, Venable DL: Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism in plants. Science 289:2335-2338 (2000).

  85. Miller JS, Venable DL: The transition to gender dimorphism on an evolutionary background of self-incompatibility: An example from Lycium (Solanceae). Am J Bot 89:1907-1915 (2002).

  86. Yeung K, Miller JS, Savage E, Husband BC, Igic B, Kohn JR: Association of ploidy and sexual system in Lycium californicum (Solanaceae). Evolution 59:2048-2055 (2005).

  87. Levin RA, Miller JS: Relationships within tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae): Paraphyly of Lycium and multiple origins of gender dimorphism. Am J Bot 92:2044-2053 (2005).

  88. Corsi G, Lokar L, Pagni AM: Biological and phytochemical aspects of Valeriana officinalis. Biochem Syst Ecol 12:57-62 (1984).

  89. Rather AM: Reproductive biology of Valeriana jatamansi Jones. University of Kashmir, Kashmir (2001).

  90. St. Hilaire L: Valeriana uliginosa (Torr. Gray) Rydb. marsh valerian. New Engl Plant Cons Prog, Framingham (2003).

  91. Hinds HR: Flora of New Brunswick 2nd edition. Biology Department, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton (2000).

  92. Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A: The Natural History of Pollination. Timber Press, Portland (1996).

  93. Titz E, Titz W. 1981 Die diploiden und tetraploiden Arznei-Baldriane der Schweiz und angrenzender Regionen (Valerianaceae). Bot. Helvetica, no.91. 169 - 188 (1981).


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azrefs.org 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə