Propagation factors affecting systems using digital modulation techniques at lf and mf




Yüklə 23.89 Kb.
tarix11.03.2016
ölçüsü23.89 Kb.

Rec. ITU-R P.1321

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P.1321*

PROPAGATION FACTORS AFFECTING SYSTEMS USING DIGITAL
MODULATION TECHNIQUES AT LF AND MF

(Question ITU-R 225/3)

(1997)

Rec. ITU-R P.1321



The ITU Radiocommunication Assembly,

considering

a) that digital modulation methods for sound broadcasting purposes at LF and MF are currently being studied under Question ITU-R 217/10;

b) that information on the propagation characteristics at these frequencies is necessary for use in the design of modulation methods,

recommends

1 that the information given in Annex 1 should be taken into account in the design of digital modulation methods for broadcasting at MF and LF.
ANNEX 1

1 Introduction


The majority of broadcasting services in the MF and LF bands are based on the characteristics of the ground wave propagation mode (see Recommendation ITU-R P.368). The limiting coverage range, during daytime and in the absence of interference, is determined by the intensity of radio noise due to lightning and to man-made sources (see Recommendation ITU R P.372) and by the required signal-to-noise ratio. During the hours of darkness, ionospheric sky wave modes become important (see Recommendation ITU-R P.1147). For analogue amplitude modulation, these modes limit the coverage, since the wave-interference between the ground wave and the varying and phase delayed sky wave modes results in unsatisfactory signal quality. Sky-wave signals from other distant transmissions may also add significant night-time interference, which may also restrict the service coverage to ranges where the ground wave provides a sufficiently strong signal; aspects of interference from other signals are not further considered in this Annex.

Digital modulation methods may also be affected by the presence of delayed signal modes, but suitable modulation design may counter or exploit this effect. This Annex presents some very simple models for this multipath environment, which are expected to be suitable for the design of modulation methods. Dependent on the modulation method chosen, more detailed prediction methods may be required for service planning purposes.


2 Propagation modes

2.1 Ground wave mode


The ground wave is essentially constant and does not exhibit significant changes with time or with atmospheric variability. As shown in Recommendation ITU-R P.368, the signal amplitude depends on range and on the electrical characteristics of the ground.

2.2 Sky-wave modes


During daylight hours, signal attenuation in the lower D-region part of the ionosphere effectively prevents sky wave propagation. This Annex concentrates on the conditions at night when sky-wave propagation may be significant.

The E-layer of the ionosphere decays after sunset, but the critical frequency, foE, will be within the MF broadcast band, at least for times in the first part of the night. Signals at frequencies less than the critical frequency will always be reflected by the E-layer, and multihop reflections will also be supported. Signals at higher frequencies may still be reflected from the E-layer, particularly to longer ranges, but signals will also penetrate the E-layer to be reflected from the higher F region. Using a simple model for the E-layer, Fig. 1 illustrates the available signal modes for three frequencies in the MF band, showing the way in which mode availability varies with ground range and with time after sunset. These modes will be time delayed compared with the ground wave mode.

Recommendation ITU-R P.1147, provides predictions for the composite signal power for the available sky-wave modes, and thus does not give the necessary information for the relative amplitudes for individual modes. However, Recommendation ITU R P.684 does provide information, although primarily intended for frequencies less than 500 kHz. In particular, it gives values for the ionospheric reflection coefficient for sunspot minimum conditions, based on experimental results, and on some assumptions, as stated in the Recommendation.

3 Multipath time spread


Using the above simple propagation models, Fig. 2 shows the expected median field strengths and relative time delays for three ranges, 100, 200 and 500 km, and two frequencies, 700 kHz and 1 MHz. The field strengths are for 1 kW e.m.r.p. and do not include the effect of the vertical radiation pattern of the transmitting antenna – this may reduce the levels of the sky-wave signals at the shorter ranges.

The mode shown at 0 ms is for the ground wave, and field strengths are shown for three values of ground conductivity; 5 S/m (sea water), 10–2 (good ground), and 10–3 (poor ground).

The sky-wave components are marked with the relevant mode and the levels approximately represent the median field strengths four hours after sunset at sunspot minimum.

Figure 3 indicates the delay of the one hop E- and F-region sky-wave modes relative to the ground wave for ranges out to 1 000 km, while Fig. 4 gives the relative delays between single and multihop sky-wave modes.

The range of distances for which the ground and sky-wave signal amplitudes are similar have particular interest since the fading exhibited in this zone is particularly severe. This has been called the “night fading zone” and has often set the limit for the range of good quality MF broadcasting.

4 Variability


The ground wave mode may be assumed to be unfading. Sky-wave modes will be subject to long term night to night variability where the hourly median values have a log normal distribution with a semi-interdecile range of between 3.5 and 9 dB. Within the hour fading of individual modes also has a log normal distribution; there are few measurement data, but a typical value for the standard deviation of about 3 dB may be assumed. The fading rate is between 10 and 30 fades per hour.

For cases when the composite amplitude of the ground wave and sky-wave modes needs to be considered, i.e. in cases where the modes cannot be separated in the receiving system, the fading distribution of the signal is discussed in Appendix 1.

The frequency shift of sky-wave modes, due to the Doppler effect on reflection from moving ionospheric layers, will be small.

FIGURE 1/M.1321...[D01] = 3 CM


FIGURE 2/M.1321...[D02] = 3 CM



FIGURE 3/M.1321...[D03] = 3 CM



FIGURE 4/M.1321...[D04] = 3 CM


5 Conclusions


Recommendation ITU-R P.1407 identifies a set of parameters for use in describing multipath effects. The “delay window”, containing more than say 98% of the total energy, may be determined from inspection of Fig. 2 as less than 3 ms. It may be noted that in some circumstances the initial multipath component will not be that with the greatest amplitude.

APPENDIX 1

TO ANNEX 1

The composite signal amplitude, e, for the combination of a steady ground wave signal and a log normally distributed sky wave signal is obtained by a power summation:



where ee and ei are the levels of the ground wave and sky-wave components, usually expressed in V/m.

The sky-wave component ei has a log normal distribution (see Recommendation ITU-R P.1057, equation (6)). For convenience it is supposed ostensibly that the ground wave component is also log normally distributed, and the final result is obtained by setting its standard deviation to 0 dB.

The combination of two log-normal distributions is also log-normally distributed where the mean level is the sum of the individual mean levels (i.e. in amplitude, not in decibels) and the variance is the sum of the two variances.

For a log-normal distribution (see Recommendation ITU-R P.1057) the mean and the standard deviation of the signal levels (V/m) are given by:



where m is the mean and  is the standard deviation of the log-normal distribution.

Using these considerations it is possible to evaluate the parameters for the combined distribution. Table 1 gives example results where the standard deviation of the log-normal sky-wave component is 3 dB.
TABLE 1


ei / ee

Mean level relative to the mean of the ground
wave component

Standard deviation

0.5 (– 6 dB)

1.3 dB

0.72 dB

1 (0 dB)

 4.4

1.35

2 ( 6 dB)

5.7

2.0

_________________





* Radiocommunication Study Group 3 made editorial amendments to this Recommendation in 2000 in accordance with Resolution ITU-R 44.


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azrefs.org 2016
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə